Classique Music šŸŽ»

@PaisleyUnderground Thanks, I haven’t ckd his Beethoven. I have a B. samples excerpts list comparing different cond/orch but I’m always looking for that combination of performance and recording quality (engineering, presence, hall resonance etc) which sound ā€œrightā€ to my ear.
Alas, better gear leads to not only more enjoyment, but also increased
fussiness! :wink:

1 Like

Cycles are rarely consistently excellent across the board. As a collector of physical media it’s frustrating to no end when you just want one performance but it’s only found within a cycle.

Streaming still has its uses.

2 Likes

I think streaming is an amazing treasure trove for classical music if you’re fussy (like me).

After I’ve drawn up my short list, my first step is to use my commute to weed through performances, by playing the same movement from different conductors. I’m just using AirPod pros, but that’s good enough to know if I like the performance (tempo, rhythm, fullness of sound). And I’ve done this enough times that I can pretty accurately extrapolate how the piece will sound in my home system.

Then I play my weeded out shortlist at home to judge the sound. I think some reviewers must have terrible systems because I’ll notice awful acoustics that the reviewer never mentioned.

3 Likes

Agreed, I mostly listen via APP2 as yourself and find them to be decent enough to get a feel for the music. Actually they are quite enjoyably tuned to my ears and for the money and convenience Im quite happy with them.

Im pretty good at that too by now but I have been caught out by ā€œApple Masteringā€ a couple times so I check to see if there is any indication of such when I use Apple Classical. I also have Idagio which is much more consistently in line with my system; however, Apple does seem to have a bit of a larger database and its layout, while sometimes annoying to me, can be helpful if you are looking for a specific album as they more prominently display covers.

I also wonder that sometimes.

1 Like

I’m a sucker for solo Da Gamba recordings, love being able to browse Apple Music Classical by instrument, adding this as a new reference album. They also have a book feature where you can open and get insight on the recording, excellent iPad companion.

3 Likes

3 Likes

Thanks for the tip. I found Gielen’s Beethoven cycle with the SWR. Besides the interpretation I really like the micing/recording done which brings out the woodwinds so cleanly and with great separation. I feel that his bit slower tempi allow me to better hear the inner intricacies of Beethoven’s amazing writing! For example the 2nd movement of the 9th (which has one of my favorite timp. parts to play, lol) is among the slower of those I tested, yet maintains the forward drive I enjoy. I plan to spend more time with this set!

Also this YT video…interesting to see them.

3 Likes

The 10 Best Classical Albums of 2024 | KPBS Public Media
My composer friend sent me this. Though I’d pass it along. The Ortiz is
very interesting, and well recorded of course. :wink:

2 Likes

Looking at @TempoTim’s list, I realized that I’ve never kept up with up to date releases before, because I tend to focus on a composer, read a lot of reviews and listen to the performances that have been recommended, and they’re often decades old.

But I just stumbled over a set of Mendelssohn’s symphonies by Paavo Jarvi that was released this year and I like it a lot. I was a little apprehensive because Jarvi’s Beethoven symphonies were a little too fast for me, but the Mendelssohn tempo was perfect for me. The sound was fantastic too.

The symphonies were released on a label called Alpha Classics, which was somewhat new to me until recently, as I’ve noticed that more and more performances that I like are on that label. In addition to great performances, I’ve noticed that every Alpha recording I’ve heard has had very good, clear sound, which hasn’t been the case with other labels.

I’ve been listening to a lot of Mendelssohn over the last few weeks, mostly discovery because I didn’t really know his work, and my favorite versions of his string quartets were by Quatuor Van Kuijk, coincidentally another Alpha Classics act.

3 Likes

@Perogie I also want to say that I’ve really enjoyed the Neumann Dvorak symphonies that you posted above.

That whole box is very very musical, and they’re my favorite performances of the Dvorak symphonies when I’m looking for something more on the relaxed end of the spectrum. That is not a complaint about tempo, I like to have something on the relaxed side and an alternative that’s more energetic, depending on my mood.

I’ve liked what I’ve heard from Rowicki & the LSO, and am still searching for a more modern recording,

Revisiting this superb live recording tonight. From Berlioz, the guy who literally wrote the book on orchestration (in 1844.) The dynamic range is stunning, from the barely audible beginning of the 3rd movement to the ear opening last movement complete with real bells and a killer bass drum and more. Great separation of instruments and detail throughout, and the ever present energy that Dudamel seems to always provide. Really imo a stunning performance and recording.
Wish I had been there! Must be quite the venue!

1 Like

Just found this new one on YT. I had never heard this before. What touch!!
I wonder who may have played it with Schubert.

1 Like

Another YT find tonight. Anyone know of a label (lossless) recording of this?
PS also the Murray Perahia/Haitink/Concertgebouw, which I can’t seem
to find either…the YT copy is an absolutely excellent performance!

2 Likes

Couldn’t find anything for the YT linked concert but maybe look up the album: Murray Perahia - Pianiste and Poete. It might have the Haitink but I cant confirm.

1 Like

I checked both discogs and Presto and couldn’t find a Schumann piano concerto from either Seong-Jin Cho or Perahia/Haitink.

Perahia/Haitink did a set of Beethoven piano concertos. And Perahia recorded the Schumann with Colin Davis and Abbado but I’ve never heard of him doing one with Haitink.

2 Likes

@PaisleyUnderground Thanks for checking. Yes, I found the Beethovens
and the Schumann w. Colin Davis is pretty good. Just that the one with
Haitink on Youtube has some real chemistry and togetherness that is
special. Hopefully Cho will do a good one soon.
Also, I saw Yunchan Lim do the Rach 2 with Minnesota a few months
ago. Excellent, imo!! Good that we have a younger generation to carry on. SO much good talent out there!

I’ve been completely spoiled by this Beethoven set for the past 2 weeks.

This is the classic reference of the Symphonies conceived as a complete cycle. A prime example of how you might hear this is the 6th, where you find the instruments rearrange spatially from movement to movement. In other words, the instruments/soundstage is changed to best suit each piece. He takes certain liberties, if you will.

The best symphonies in this Karajan box are 5,6,7 and 9. I haven’t wrapped my mind around the 8th, and the only Eroica I can think about when listening to Eroica is Furtwangler ā€˜44.

6 Likes

Is that Karajan’s 1960’s cycle? I’ve heard that’s the best of the 4 cycles he recorded, but I haven’t heard it, or at least not in several decades.

I already have 12 Beethoven symphony cycles that I really like, so I’m afraid to try any more.

4 Likes

Yup. The one released in ā€˜63.

I think people believe he became too ā€œslickā€ as the years went on; more strings less horns and timpani. Whatever. Karajan is a legend no matter what.

He definitely had a style though… always chasing beauty. You either like it or you don’t.

As for the recording quality, it is very good. Not sure what format you prefer, but it’s chunky and cohesive on SACD. Gets the point across. Not too much noise, either. YMMV depending on your system.

Edit: It was recorded Mid Side (two mics) and not a forest of mics which is probably why I think it is cohesive.

I can’t believe you have 12 cycles but not this one. You can always stream it to see if you like it.

2 Likes

I had a few later Karajan albums when I started buying classical CDs in the 80s, including his 1977 Beethoven 9th (which I really liked), but you’re right, I fell prey to the bias against him, especially when historically informed performances became the flavor of the month, with their raspy strings.

Growing up in England, John Eliot Gardiner was the local hero in the early 90s, and his HIP Beethoven was my favorite at the time (and is still one of those 12 that I like). And then when I got married, one of our presents was the box of Harnoncourt/COE Beethoven box, and that became another favorite, so I was a HIP fan for a long time. I’ve expanded my taste since then.

I had a similar bias against Bernstein, based on my dislike of his later performances on DG, which I found a bit boring (no offence to fans of later Bernstein, it’s just my taste). It was only a few years ago, when I listened to some of his earlier NYPO performances of Mahler, that I realized what an idiot I’d been for ignoring him as a conductor. The younger Bernstein was much more exciting, which is generally what I like, and I’ve been listening to a lot of his performances over the last few years.

I’ll give Karajan another chance and will let you know what I think.

2 Likes